SecurityInfoWatch, click to go home
Most Popular: Today | OverallMost E-Mailed: Today | Overall

Video Surveillance Reality Check: Part 1

Industry thinkers weigh in with current perspectives on surveillance industry trends
BY BOB BANERJEE, BOSCH SECURITY SYSTEMS
SecurityInfoWatch.com
Updated: 11-18-2009 10:08 am
Dr. Bob Banerjee is the IP video product marketing manager for Bosch Security Systems, and is the first of four columnists sharing their opinions on the state of the video surveillance industry.
SecurityInfoWatch.com

[Editor's Note: SecurityInfoWatch.com asked four industry notables to blow away the hype, roll up their sleeves, get their hands dirty and not pull any punches when it comes to where they see the video surveillance industry today. The result was honest, open takes on our business. Their columns will be appearing consecutively on SecurityInfoWatch.com. Part 1, our first guest column, appears from Dr. Bob Banerjee, who is the IP video product marketing manager for Bosch Security Systems. In subsequent parts, each written by a different guest columnist, we'll link all these stories together and promote the heck out of them on the site (all will appear on the "columns and features" segment of our Video Surveillance section; click the "products" navigation drop down and choose "video surveillance"). We hope we stir up some feelings. The comments area is open, so share your perspectives, too!]

Can you trust anyone for good advice?

In the stable, well-understood and mature world of non IP-video (analog cameras and DVRs), there's no shortage of high-quality advice, from the manufacturer to the specifier/integrator and everyone in-between. In the chaotic world of IP video, up-to-date knowledge of one product set is a luxury few can declare. And up-to-date knowledge of multiple IP video product sets from multiple manufacturers is bordering on pure fantasy.

This puts everyone in the value chain in an awkward position. They depend on a very small number of true experts, or worse, they rely on a non-expert and deploy a solution that won't work. So end users educate themselves and design the solution, often directly engaging the manufacturer. This is a risky distraction for end users whose primary business is not security, and a challenge for manufacturers who scramble to act like an integrator in order to present a viable end-to-end solution. It is clearly also a problem for everyone else in between.

The latest and greatest

We're in love with whatever's new; that's human instinct. Magazines, tradeshows, webinars and roadshows satisfy this desire. But it's not always in the interest of the end user who has a problem to solve and doesn't want to have months of flaming emails with the installer or the manufacturer who sold them something bleeding edge, which was positioned as "Oh sure, we've deployed this in many places but if I tell you where I'll have to kill you". In fact it's so bleeding edge that it's actually not touching the blade at all. Think hard not about what you want but what you're trying to do, and then ask for multiple solutions before specifying what the solution should be.

What do you really want to be able to do? Detect, Classify, Recognize, Identify (DCRI)

What do you need in your situation? Is it a retina scan at 900 feet to prove it's Bob? To see enough facial detail to suggest it is Bob? To know it's a good or a bad guy? To know it's even a man and not some wild animal? Or just to know there's something strange out there?

Understanding what you want to do, rather than how you can leverage the latest technology can often reveal many innovative solutions to a given problem. Not all roads lead to megapixel cameras, nor even IP cameras, but they should be candidates for consideration. Use the concept of DCRI to set your expectations based on real needs.

1 2 3 next

Post a Comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

Great to read your thoughts Bob

Your comments on lighting reminded me about the systems I was selling just after 911. We had limited storage capabilities so we were using motion detection on most of our shots, whether they were situational views or specific views. I remember having many business owners install motion lights within their locations to activate the cameras. And by positioning the cameras just under the lights we always took good facial shots of the perpetrators when the lights went on. They always looked up! It was a simple solution to both motion detection and lighting, but it worked.

I have sold over $200,000,000 dollars worth of video surveillance technology since then and today I still use both analog and IP technology, because I us as much of the existing technology as I can to be cost effective. I agree that the HD solutions have value for the situational views but I still like megapixel views for the specific views or “Money Shots”. I have always felt that the better this shot the quicker it will be on the evening news, this shot is all about evidence.

I look forward to future installments.