Do public cameras work?
If you're in the security industry, I think you're predisposed, like I am, to believe that security cameras have a deterring effect on crime. We're all probably right at some level, but a new study looks at the San Francisco city surveillance project, and what the study found was a municipal surveillance system that wasnâ€™t altogether effective. Among the findings: â€œWe find no evidence of impact of the cameras on violent crime.â€ So San Franciscans are just as likely to be mugged under a crime camera as they are in a dark alley?
One of the things that you have to remember about the San Fran system is that this is a town that has long been associated with individualism, personal rights and privacy. Unlike some public surveillance projects which send the video to police substations for real-time monitoring, the San Francisco system isnâ€™t monitored live. Rather, the system is only for evidentiary review after an incident is reported.
The system also is faced with poor image quality, the report states, but thatâ€™s almost to be expected, given the environmental challenges of city surveillance. That was also linked to budgets â€“ the data was being compressed significantly, and the study staid the imaging would be better if the city bought more data storage and could thereby lessen the compression effects or increase frame rate. Apparently, the city bought high-res cameras that could shoot up to 12 frames per second, but the frame rate on the cityâ€™s system is generally only at 3 or 4 frames per second and sometimes even lower.
The biggest challenges, overall, seemed to be that the system was integrated well into police functions (like the live monitoring) and that more training for staff was needed on how to access and use the footage.
Even though the system apparently was fairly ineffective, it would seem that itâ€™s hampered by not having good monitoring and not having good images. Letâ€™s be honest, if Joe Criminal sees a surveillance camera where heâ€™s going to commit a crime, but itâ€™s dark, and he knows that 1) the camera isnâ€™t be monitored and that 2) the images are too poor to use for identification, would you really expect it to be a deterrent for him?
Safety never takes a holiday
Mall cop movie kicks off today
Itâ€™s the first security movie of 2009, and youâ€™ve all undoubtedly seen the previews. Paul Blart Mall Cop is the story of a man who, repeatedly failing to make the state police roster, is the security guard trapped inside a mall as a team of highly trained robbers strike. Heâ€™s a take-charge-of-the-donuts kind of guy stuck inside todayâ€™s world of "observe and report" security mandates, andâ€¦wellâ€¦you have to watch the move to find out if he becomes target practice or a mall cop hero. The movie opens today in theaters nationwide, but fortunately, our friend and columnist Liz Martinez, author of The Retail Managerâ€™s Guide to Loss Prevention sat down for a pre-screening. The movie, she said, was better than she expected, and raises some of the core questions about mall security and interactions with retail security. Check out her review of "Paul Blart Mall Cop."
Switching from the government into private sector security
New book shares authorâ€™s experiences going from DEA to Fortune 500-level corporate security
In our SIW forums, we get a lot of questions from police officers and federal agents and even military veterans who want to make a transition into corporate security. Finally, someone has written a book to answer those questions. The Security Executive Council just announced the book From One Winning Career to the Next: Transitioning Public Sector Leadership and Security Expertise to the Business Bottom Line today, and I donâ€™t have a copy on my shelf yet, but according to the council, the book hits on the topics that we normally hear asked as people prepare to make that transition. The book draws on the experiences of author David Quilterâ€™s move from the public sector (DEA) into the private sector (Fortune 500 corporate security) after a lengthy career. At first glance (and without a review), this sounds like great nighttime reading for government security professionals nearing retirement.