Sharon West was appalled when her elderly parents were pulled aside for extra screening before flying from Fort Lauderdale to Norfolk, Va., a year ago.
Her mother, then 74, had a hard time breathing and walking, while her father, then 75, had undergone a knee replacement.
Yet, they were ordered to stand with legs spread and arms out, as screeners ran metal-detecting wands and hands over them. Today, her parents refuse to fly.
"The indignity they felt was the fact that people were touching them," said West, 53, of Davie. "I believe in obeying the rules, but it is insane to treat everybody like a criminal."
The Transportation Security Administration says all passengers must be subject to stiff screenings because a wheelchair or a baby stroller could be laden with explosives. It cites as justification a 2003 incident in which a .22-caliber pistol was found stashed inside a teddy bear held by a 10-year-old boy in Orlando.
"We have found artfully concealed weapons in wheelchairs, prosthetic limbs as well as in children's toys and even on children," TSA spokeswoman Lauren Stover said.
While critics don't dispute the need for security, they call for a more gentle way to process elderly, very young and handicapped travelers. Their plea comes after women complained the TSA's "pat-down" policy was too invasive and offensive.
For most people, secondary examinations are not that big a deal. Passengers are inspected with wands and, sometimes, physical pat-downs. They can be asked to remove shoes and other items of clothing. In addition, their personal belongings are carefully checked, a process that can take a total of 15 minutes.
But for seniors and the disabled, such scrutiny can be intimidating because of the close personal contact with screeners, say advocates for the elderly and the handicapped.
"When you're traveling with someone who has very limited mobility, you scratch your head when you see the intensity of the screening they go through," said Karen Dickerhoof, executive director of the Center for Independent Living of Broward, in Tamarac, which helps the physically disabled.
Robert McFalls, chief executive officer of the Area Agency on Aging of Palm Beach/Treasure Coast, agrees extra care should be taken not to offend people with mobility problems, but he says he thinks they still should be carefully examined.
"The bottom line is we do advocate seniors to be treated equally, and no less than other people," he said.
Eventually, the TSA hopes technological advances will allow it to eliminate the need for stringent secondary screenings while maintaining a high level of security.
So-called explosives-detection portals are being tested at seven airports, including Tampa and Jacksonville. Air is blown at passengers as they go through the machine, and the air is analyzed for explosives. The portals are to be tested at Miami International Airport this month.
Another device in the testing phase, using backscatter technology, would enable screeners to see whether travelers are hiding weapons or explosives on their persons without requiring a physical inspection.
Yet another tool, a document scanner able to detect traces of explosives on boarding passes, is already in use at five airports.
And a program called Secure Flight would cross-reference traveler names with those on lists of suspected terrorists or those who have been involved in security incidents.
For now, the TSA says it must work under the current security system, which requires airlines to randomly select between 10 and 15 percent of travelers for extra screening. The airlines rely on computers to do this.
Passengers also might undergo additional screening if they trigger a metal-detector alarm, or if a screener finds their appearance suspicious, for example, because of bulky clothing.
A traveler who generates too many suspicious factors under the government's profiling system, such as buying a one-way ticket, paying for a ticket with cash or having a name that matches one on suspicious-name lists, might also face extra screening.