News
SecurityInfoWatch




Home » Magazine Archives » September 2007

Security Technology Executive

Most Popular StoriesMost Read Most Emailed StoriesMost Emailed Email This StoryE-mail Article Print This StoryPrint Article
Save Article | License Article [Get Copyright Permissions]
Updated: March 5th, 2008 02:12 PM EDT

Lessons Learned

Physical Security & IT Collaboration

The Latest from SIW

Mace to launch dealer program, acquire central station CEO says company also refocusing product line with plans to add access control and burglar alarms products Basics of establishing an employee ID badging system From photos to badge design and ensuring HR buy-in, here's what you need to know The security week that was: 1/02/09 The top 40 security stories of 2008 Homemade bombs force evacuations in Aspen, Colo. Toronto wraps up municipal surveillance pilot project

By Ray Bernard, PSP, CHS III
Security Technology & Design

Over the past four years at leading companies, the physical/corporate security departments and IT departments have been collaborating to improve security in both domains. This article presents three key lessons learned in those collaborative efforts, and provides a list of potential collaboration points between physical security and IT.

Lesson One: Integrate Processes, Not Systems

For many physical/IT collaborations, the initial thinking revolved around the systems integration tasks.

Data had to flow out of one system and into another. As the systems integration work was defined, more and more questions came up — such as where specific data comes from, who is responsible for the data, and so on. The process owners at the systems level were consulted. After quite a few iterations, enough questions were answered that the systems integration could be accomplished. The connections worked, so the project was considered successful.

However, for these projects, only systems-level documentation existed. What about the high-level impact on the business? That wasn't considered, but the common assumption was that it had to be better after the project. That's not necessarily a good assumption. When you automate an error-prone process, the errors simply happen faster. Additionally, the automation may provide opportunities to refine or improve the process at the business level.

Today's Integration Perspective

Collaboration benefits are available at all levels of security management and technology implementation, especially when security processes are examined within the context of the business processes. According to Wikipedia, the term Business Process Management (or BPM) refers to a set of activities which organizations can perform to either optimize their business processes or adapt them to new organizational needs. That's a very interesting description, because security executives and managers must optimize security processes to be aligned with the business, and adapt them to new business needs, including the changing risk picture of the business.

Additionally, the job of security is to reduce risks to acceptable levels at an acceptable cost. That means operational efficiency (i.e. process efficiency) comes into play as well when considering the total cost of security, especially for large organizations.

This is today's perspective for security practitioners. As Dr. Gerald L. Kovacich and Edward P. Halibozek have stated on page 14 of the book Security Metrics Management : “Security professionals who understand the corporate and global environment have a better chance of personal and professional success than those who do not.”

1 2 3 4 next

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for copyright permissions!
Copyright 2009 Cygnus Business Media







SIW eNews

FrontLine

Markets & Sys

PracticeReport

AppReport

ProductWatch

EventWatch

Weekly Recap

EndUser Blasts

Dealer Blasts