Poll Results on Arming Students

There is not much that starts a spirited debate faster than talking about guns on college and university campuses.  Currently only Utah allows students and faculty over 21 to carry a concealed weapon on all public colleges and universities.

Other states are trying to get on the list, however within the past month, legislatures in Texas, Louisiana and Missouri have defeated bills to do so.

Patrick Fiel, public safety advisor for ADT and former head of security for Washington, D.C. Public Schools, said he recently conducted an unscientific, but interesting poll on the social media site, LinkedIn.

"In only an hour, I received 284 votes, with more than 86 percent of those against allowing concealed weapons on campuses, ” he said.

Here is a summary of the results:

Would letting students carry concealed weapons at college be a good idea?

Yes    13 percent

No     86 percent

Looking closer at the people who voted yes, we can see there are more than three times as many men than women who voted yes, 22 percent to 7 percent.

Also, the age group that most supported guns on campus was aged 55 or older.

Fiel himself is an ardent opponent to arming students.

“An armed citizenry will never replace, nor will it add, to trained police at a college or university,” he said.

–  PSW staff

About the Author

PublicSafetyWatch blog

The PublicSafetyWatch blog is sponsored by ADT Security Services, Inc. ('ADT') and SecurityInfoWatch.com with contributions from SecurityInfoWatch.com staff editors, ADT, public safety and security industry experts and professionals. The purpose of the blog is to discuss security related topics such as school security, municipal surveillance, public transportation security, public safety security concerns, and security innovations. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the PublicSafetyWatch blog are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions of SecurityInfoWatch.com, Cygnus Business media, Inc., or ADT Security Services, Inc. or any of their parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, stockholders, directors, officers, employees or agents (the 'Sponsors'). The Sponsors do not endorse nor are they responsible for any opinions, advice, content, omissions, hyperlinks, images, articles, information or statements made or displayed within this blog by third parties. The Sponsors reserve the right to delete, withhold from publication, or edit any comment for any reason whatsoever. All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. The Sponsors make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis with no warranties. Terms and Conditions of Use: By reading, viewing, accessing, contributing or otherwise using this blog, you acknowledge the foregoing Disclaimer and agree to these Terms of Use. All information published shall become the property of the Sponsors. You are granted a nonexclusive, nontransferable, limited right to access, use and display the blog and the materials provided hereon, provided that you comply fully with these Terms and Conditions of Use. Under no circumstances shall the Sponsors, contributors or suppliers, or their agents, be liable for any loss or damage caused by your reliance on any information contained within this blog. The Sponsors will attempt to respond to specific issues, questions, complaints, or concerns that are brought to their attention; however, the Sponsors have no obligation to monitor any content displayed/posted on this blog.