Legal Brief: To Litigate or Not to Litigate

Before you decide to pursue a case, be sure you understand these six potential perils.
Oct. 20, 2025
4 min read

Key Highlights

  • Litigation is a multi-year money pit: Even "simple" security cases involving defective systems or breach of contract routinely consume months to years and rack up costs across attorney fees, expert witnesses, depositions, and discovery, with no guarantee of recovery even if you win.
  • Your dirty laundry becomes public record: Expect emails, texts, and internal communications to be collected, scrutinized, and potentially weaponized in public filings.
  • Winning ≠ collecting: A perfect legal victory means nothing if the defendant is insolvent or underinsured. Collection can become an entirely separate battle that costs more than the judgment is worth, especially in smaller cases.

 

This article appeared in the October 2025 issue of Security Business magazine. Don’t forget to mention Security Business magazine on LinkedIn and @SecBusinessMag on Twitter if you share it.

I am often asked what I do for a living. I usually answer that I am a litigator. For those unfamiliar with the term, I explain further that a litigator is like an alligator, only not as nice.

Security litigation cases can involve a variety of claims, such as defective hardware/software, failure to perform promised services (e.g., monitoring or alarm response), negligence by property owners/security companies, breach of contract, deceptive trade practices, customer theft, or even criminal consequences for alleged security lapses.

Although there are different types of claims, there are some constants in litigation, and not all of them are good. When you commence litigation, you should do so knowing all the accompanying perils. It may still be worth the effort, but it is important to be fully informed and for expectations to be managed.

Here are six things you should be aware of before initiating a litigation case:

1. Cost. Litigation is expensive, and even a seemingly simple case can involve intricacies. Attorney fees, expert witness fees, vendor fees, court filing fees, discovery costs (interrogatories, document collection/review/production, depositions), travel, and other costs commonly arise in litigation.

Litigation can take months or years (especially with appeals), and delays – such as waiting for court schedules, discovery, motions, rulings, etc. – are common. If you are seeking a quick fix, litigation is rarely the right path.

2. Time commitment. While you may hire counsel to prosecute or defend a litigation, your time may be devoted to it too. Clients cannot subcontract their role as witness, document custodian, decision-maker, etc. Litigation can take months or years (especially with appeals), and delays – such as waiting for court schedules, discovery, motions, rulings, etc. – are common. If you are seeking a quick fix, litigation is rarely the right path.

3. Uncertainty. We cannot predict with certainty what a court may do, what issues an adversary may raise, how the law may evolve, how the evidence will be perceived, etc. Courts do not always get it right. Even with a good case, you might lose. The judge or jury might find no breach, minimal damages, or may assign only partial liability. Your adversary could assert defenses, counterclaims, or seek invasive discovery. Clients want certainty, but litigation cannot provide it. We often counsel clients on what “should” happen based on the facts and the law. What “will” happen is always uncertain.

4. Stress. All of the issues discussed so far (cost, time, uncertainty) can lead to stress. Litigation is adversarial – you may be questioned under oath, and your actions (or inactions) may be subject to scrutiny. A good lawyer can assist with all of these things, but litigation can be quite consuming and disruptive.

5. Loss of privacy. Legal filings and court records are often public. If your case involves sensitive or embarrassing information, it may end up in the public domain. Worse, your adversary may seek to use it against you. If they sense that you are concerned about a particular fact, and do not wish for it to be public, they will attempt to exploit it – either to inspire a settlement or because it bears on the merits of the case.

Your emails, texts, and other communications may be collected, searched, reviewed, shared with the other side and put in the public record. Sometimes, this happens even when you think your communications have no relevance to the proceeding, because the court may disagree.

6. Risk of reduced or no recovery. Your lawyer may handle everything perfectly and you may win the case; however, if the defendant is insolvent, goes out of business, or has inadequate insurance, any resulting judgment may be hard, if not impossible, to collect.

If not voluntarily paid or settled, the process of collecting on a judgment can feel like a wholly separate litigation. While that effort may be worth it for larger cases, smaller matters require careful deliberation on whether you will spend more seeking to collect than you will yield.

Is it Worth It?

Whether it is worth all of these risks to litigate or continue to litigate will depend on your lawyer, the strength of your case, the amount of damages, your capacity to absorb the cost, your risk tolerance, whether a principle is at stake, etc.

Consider this article like a release you sign at a ski resort. Skiing presents many perils, and it is important to know them before strapping on your skis; thus, the ski resort ensures that you are advised of the risks before you start.

As long as you fully understand and appreciate the risks, skiing can be a real joy. While that cannot be said about litigation, it is important, as with skiing, that you understand the risks before getting involved so you and your lawyer can handle it in the best possible way for your company, whether defending or pursuing claims.

About the Author

Timothy J. Pastore, Esq.

Timothy J. Pastore, Esq.

Timothy J. Pastore Esq., is a Partner in the New York office of Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP (www.mmwr.com), where he is Vice-Chair of the Litigation Department. Before entering private practice, he was an officer and Judge Advocate General (JAG) in the U.S. Air Force and Attorney with the DOJ. [email protected]  •  (212) 551-7707

Meet Timothy J. Pastore

Timothy J. Pastore, Esq., is the newest columnist to join the Security Business magazine family. He is a Partner in the New York office of Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP (www.mmwr.com), where he is Vice-Chair of the Litigation Department. 

Before entering private practice, Mr. Pastore was an officer and Judge Advocate General (JAG) in the U.S. Air Force and a Special Assistant U.S. Attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice. As a JAG, in particular, Mr. Pastore was legal counsel to the Air Force Security Forces and Air Force Office of Special Investigations.

Mr. Pastore has represented some of the largest companies in the security industry, including Protection One, Comcast, Charter, Cox, Altice, Mediacom, IASG, CMS and others. He regularly provides counsel on risk management, contracting, operations, licensing, sales practices, etc. Mr. Pastore also has served as lead counsel in courts throughout the country in dozens of litigation matters involving the security industry.

Among other examples, Mr. Pastore led the successful defense at trial of cable giant Comcast in a home invasion case in Seattle, Washington. The case received significant press attention and was heralded by CVN as a top-ten defense verdict.

Mr. Pastore is a graduate of Bucknell University and Boston College Law School.

Reach him at (212) 551-7707 or by e-mail at [email protected].

 

Sign up for SecurityInfoWatch Newsletters
Get the latest news and updates.

Voice Your Opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of SecurityInfoWatch, create an account today!