Fenway Park’s Security Modernization Offers Lessons for Legacy Venues

Johnson Controls and Fenway Park explain how a century-old ballpark balanced preservation requirements, operational demands and future scalability during a major security modernization.

Key Highlights

  • Early planning matters: Successful modernization begins with aligning operations, preservation and interoperability goals before installation starts.

  • Proactive beats reactive: Remote diagnostics and predictive maintenance can reduce downtime, service calls and the operational burden on security teams.

  • Historic doesn't mean outdated: Legacy venues can modernize security without sacrificing their architectural character by treating preservation as a core design requirement.

There’s no generic blueprint for securing a stadium that opened before World War I. Fenway Park, which has welcomed fans since 1912, sits at the intersection of two realities that don’t naturally get along: a 114-year-old physical structure with all the architectural constraints that entails, and the expectation that security operations match what any modern large-venue environment demands.

When the Red Sox organization and Johnson Controls set out to overhaul Fenway’s security infrastructure, the project quickly became something more instructive than a routine stadium upgrade. It became a real-world test case for a question that operators of historic venues across the country often grapple with: How do you bring aging security infrastructure up to current standards without doing damage — physical or otherwise — to the thing you’re trying to protect?

Fenway's experience suggests the answer lies as much in planning as technology. Preservation, operations and security were treated as interconnected design objectives rather than competing priorities, shaping everything from installation decisions to long-term maintenance and future scalability.

That work began long before anyone picked up a drill.

The problem with waiting

For many legacy venues, one of the biggest operational challenges isn’t simply aging infrastructure. It’s the reliance on reactive maintenance, where equipment problems aren’t addressed until they begin disrupting operations. Reactive maintenance is expensive and disruptive in any facility. In a venue where structural interventions can carry preservation implications, the stakes are even higher.

At Fenway, the gaps were real. Cameras and access control equipment were struggling to provide the kind of proactive monitoring that prevents small issues from becoming operational disruptions. When something did break, it required a truck roll — dispatching a technician on-site — which drove unpredictable maintenance costs and extended downtime. According to Johnson Controls, legacy infrastructure can run 30% to 40% more expensive to maintain than systems with proactive lifecycle management in place.

Ryan Kozul, Senior Director of Ballpark Operations at Fenway Park, described an infrastructure that was no longer keeping pace with the venue's operational needs. “We saw fundamental flaws in security across our entry points, seating areas and restricted spaces, all of which tied back to our outdated infrastructure.”

The installation problem nobody talks about enough

Running cable through a century-old stadium sounds straightforward until you’re actually in the walls of a building that’s listed on historical registries and carries the kind of cultural weight that makes a misplaced drill hole a news story. The physical installation challenge in legacy venues is real and often underestimated.

Aging architecture and historical preservation guidelines come with the territory, according to Greg Parker, Vice President of Americas Life Cycle Solutions at Johnson Controls. What sets legacy work apart from a standard install, he said, is “the added responsibility to keep character intact.”

The solution at Fenway centered heavily on going wireless where possible. A wireless video surveillance network reduced the need to run new cabling through the building’s existing structure — a significant advantage when the walls you’re working around have preservation requirements attached to them. Digital integration also became a core design principle rather than an afterthought. By connecting video surveillance and access control under a unified platform, the team could consolidate functionality without multiplying the physical footprint of the technology.

That planning carried through to the deployment itself. The project included 429 Illustra cameras integrated into American Dynamics NVR systems, including three 32-megapixel cameras covering the bleacher areas. Forty-nine access control devices (IP links and controllers) were prioritized and sequenced based on traffic patterns and operational importance, ensuring the highest-priority entry points were addressed first. The deployment balanced broad security coverage with a relatively modest physical footprint, helping preserve the ballpark’s historic character.

Treating preservation as a design parameter from the outset, rather than a constraint to work around, ultimately shaped both the planning process and the deployment itself.

Why early alignment changes everything

Parker was emphatic on one point that practitioners often learn the hard way: interoperability and integration have to be discussed before design is locked in, not after.

“If systems integrations and interoperability are not discussed and planned for in the earliest stages, then projects are vulnerable to inconsistent goals, miscommunication or project delays,” he said. “That’s where Johnson Controls comes in: with our services, we are helping customers visualize real-world examples of the ROI that can be realized when interoperability is considered early in the design stage.”

At Fenway, this meant bringing together construction, facility and business teams before decisions were made. Not to check boxes but to surface the operational priorities that would drive design choices. Which access points carry the highest traffic? Which security zones are most critical during non-game events? What does the maintenance team actually need to manage the system day-to-day?

That kind of early-stage alignment isn’t unique to historic venues, but it matters more in them. When you can’t tear out walls or run conduit wherever you want, knowing exactly what you need before you start installation eliminates costly corrections later. In a building where every intervention has structural and aesthetic implications, doing something twice isn’t just expensive, it’s potentially damaging.

Kozul reinforced this from the operator’s side: “It’s incredibly important to work with a partner who fully understands both the historical significance of a venue, the technology behind a modern approach to security and has experience working across departments to holistically bring that vision to life.”

What remote resolution actually changes

The Connected Security Services platform Johnson Controls deployed at Fenway is a cloud-based system that provides continuous visibility into the health of security devices — cameras, access control points, network components — with real-time alerts when performance degrades or a device goes offline. That allows technicians to diagnose and often resolve issues without ever setting foot in the building.

In the first six months following implementation — June through November 2025 — the numbers were clear. Of 62 total security issues identified and addressed, 59 were resolved remotely. That’s a 95% remote resolution rate. Truck rolls dropped by more than 50%. Video systems accounted for 54 of those 59 remote resolutions, while access control systems accounted for the remaining five. All systems were restored within 24 business hours or less.

For venue operators, those numbers represent more than cost savings, though the cost savings are substantial. They represent a shift in how a security team spends its time. Instead of coordinating technician visits and managing reactive vendor calls during events, Fenway’s security team receives precise issue identification and troubleshooting guidance that lets them stay focused on operations.

Kozul noted that the team is now identifying and addressing issues before they escalate into operational disruptions, and doing so without touching what makes the ballpark distinctive.

The operational benefit Parker described will resonate with anyone managing a venue during high-attendance events. The system, he said, “allowed them to spend less time managing vendors and established greater confidence in security systems during critical events.”

That confidence matters. Resolving 95% of issues remotely means on-site technicians spend less time responding to routine equipment problems and more time addressing the issues that genuinely require their expertise.

Staffing realities make this more urgent

Fenway Park's experience also reflects a broader challenge facing large venues. According to research by QMi, 95% of U.S. venue security directors report staffing shortages. That statistic reframes the conversation about technology investment in large venues.

When organizations can’t fully staff security operations, the systems they deploy have to do more with less human oversight. Automated alerts, remote diagnostics and proactive monitoring aren’t premium features in that environment — they’re operational necessities. A system that requires a truck roll every time something goes wrong only adds to the strain by pulling technicians away from other priorities.

For legacy venues, the challenge becomes cyclical. Aging infrastructure typically demands more maintenance, increasing the number of service calls and consuming staff time that could otherwise be spent preventing the next problem before it disrupts operations.

Breaking that cycle is what the shift from reactive to proactive maintenance is designed to accomplish.

A foundation, not a finish line

Parker said the Fenway deployment was designed as a foundation rather than a finish line. With video surveillance and access control operating under a unified platform, the ballpark now has the architecture to incorporate new capabilities as operational needs evolve.

“By operating these solutions under a single interface, it is now easier for Fenway to integrate next-generation innovations like AI, machine learning and automation into its security protocols,” Parker said.

The scalability extends beyond the ballpark itself. As the Red Sox organization and the City of Boston continue developing the campus surrounding Fenway — including restaurants, apartments, hotels and retail — the security foundation can expand alongside that growth without requiring a new ground-up implementation.

Kozul echoed that long-term view, saying the value of a digital-first approach isn't limited to what it delivers today. Building a scalable security foundation positions the venue to adapt as operational demands continue to evolve while preserving the historic character that makes the ballpark unique.

For operators who wonder whether a building's age limits its ability to modernize, Parker believes the Fenway project demonstrates otherwise.

“If our project with America’s oldest, most beloved ballpark demonstrates anything,” he said, “it's that any venue is capable of transformational systems change. It just takes a team to achieve that change.”

About the Author

Rodney Bosch

Editor-in-Chief/SecurityInfoWatch.com

Rodney Bosch is the Editor-in-Chief of SecurityInfoWatch.com. He has covered the security industry since 2006 for multiple major security publications. Reach him at [email protected].

Sign up for our eNewsletters
Get the latest news and updates