Find money for the cameras

After weeks of heated debate, the voters of Columbia, Mo. last week approved Proposition 1, a measure that authorizes the placement of four video surveillance cameras in the city’s downtown area. The vote was 59 percent in favor of the cameras that will allow police to monitor the streets and sidewalks.

The mother of a young man who was attacked and beaten by seven people last year spearheaded the effort. She formed a pro-camera group, Keep Columbia Safe.

One problem with the proposition – there was no funding identified nor was there a deadline for operation of the cameras. Opponents of the measure still hope to defeat it when the funding debate comes to the city council.

Patrick Fiel, public safety advisor for ADT Security Services, said he hopes the council will have the foresight to carry out the wishes of the electorate and locate the estimated $50,000 it will take to get the cameras purchased and installed.

“Cameras are an invaluable anti-crime tool and can often be more cost-effective than additional police officers,” he said. “Cameras don’t take days off and work around the clock. And they also fit well with the concept of community policing.”

Fiel also strongly recommended the city budget for maintenance and service of the cameras to make sure they continue to operate as planned.

– PSW staff

About the Author

PublicSafetyWatch blog

The PublicSafetyWatch blog is sponsored by ADT Security Services, Inc. ('ADT') and SecurityInfoWatch.com with contributions from SecurityInfoWatch.com staff editors, ADT, public safety and security industry experts and professionals. The purpose of the blog is to discuss security related topics such as school security, municipal surveillance, public transportation security, public safety security concerns, and security innovations. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the PublicSafetyWatch blog are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions of SecurityInfoWatch.com, Cygnus Business media, Inc., or ADT Security Services, Inc. or any of their parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, stockholders, directors, officers, employees or agents (the 'Sponsors'). The Sponsors do not endorse nor are they responsible for any opinions, advice, content, omissions, hyperlinks, images, articles, information or statements made or displayed within this blog by third parties. The Sponsors reserve the right to delete, withhold from publication, or edit any comment for any reason whatsoever. All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. The Sponsors make no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis with no warranties. Terms and Conditions of Use: By reading, viewing, accessing, contributing or otherwise using this blog, you acknowledge the foregoing Disclaimer and agree to these Terms of Use. All information published shall become the property of the Sponsors. You are granted a nonexclusive, nontransferable, limited right to access, use and display the blog and the materials provided hereon, provided that you comply fully with these Terms and Conditions of Use. Under no circumstances shall the Sponsors, contributors or suppliers, or their agents, be liable for any loss or damage caused by your reliance on any information contained within this blog. The Sponsors will attempt to respond to specific issues, questions, complaints, or concerns that are brought to their attention; however, the Sponsors have no obligation to monitor any content displayed/posted on this blog.