The Skinny
- Organized retail crime (ORC) is escalating: Retail theft losses surged to $42.6 billion by 2023, with $101 billion lost to return fraud, while violence associated with shoplifting has sharply increased.
- Law enforcement and legal systems are evolving: States like Arizona and Kansas are leading the way with model legislation, inter-agency collaboration, and innovative prosecutorial strategies to treat ORC as an organized, multi-jurisdictional crime.
- National response is taking shape: The first-ever National ORC Blitz in May 2025 marks a turning point in collective efforts by over 30 states, signaling that retail theft is no longer being ignored and will be prosecuted aggressively.
During the Covid pandemic years of 2020 through 2023, retail losses from external theft leaped from $32.1 billion to $42.6 billion. Additionally, $101 billion in losses from fraudulent returns were incurred in 2023, and over 90% of retailers reported an increase in violence from shoplifters, as indicated by the 2024 report "The Impact of Retail Theft & Violence" from the National Retail Federation (NRF) and the Loss Prevention Research Council (LPRC). If the statistics continue to follow these upward trends, retailers can expect grim years ahead.
However, there is good news on the horizon. An increased awareness of retail crime, combined with advancements in technology and increased collaboration, means that sellers have more tools at their disposal to combat crime than ever before.
An Understanding of Wholesale Shoplifting
Looking back a decade, the scene is one of loss prevention personnel thoroughly investigating and preparing organized retail crime (ORC) cases for prosecution, only to have to knock on doors and find a tolerant detective or patient prosecutor willing to take the case. Fortunately, times have changed and so have law enforcement attitudes.
Organized retail crime associations (ORCAs), comprising members from the retail sector, law enforcement agencies, and prosecutors’ offices, have proliferated over the past decade. Regional ORCA members meet regularly to exchange information about ORC rings or individual frequent fliers who hit stores in their areas. Each membership sector works in a circle because when law enforcement is willing to put time and effort into investigating ORC cases, retailers are more likely to report each incident. And because of this cooperation, prosecutors have begun collaborating with their counterparts in nearby areas to bring charges against thieves who can no longer hide behind the protection of county or state lines and information silos.
Today’s understanding that ORC is not the same as shoplifting for personal use is reflected in legislation designed to facilitate the prosecution of wholesale shoplifters. While the perennial attempt to pass anti-ORC laws at the federal level has not yet been successful, many states have hardened their statutes to make charging these crimes easier. In much the same way that the 1970 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) statute made it easier for law enforcement to crack down on Mafia-type organized crime groups, contemporary ORC state laws allow prosecutors to bring charges based on patterns of criminal activity in the retail sector.
In the Phoenix, Ariz., area, law enforcement and prosecutors from the city, surrounding towns, and other Arizona counties collaborate through the AZ ORCA group that meets monthly to share information about retail crimes. In addition, the Maricopa County Attorney’s and the Arizona Attorney General’s offices have ORC task forces led by prosecutors who are experienced in retail crime.
In practice, the county and municipal prosecutors collaborate to address the issue of ORC teams or individuals who target multiple Arizona cities. A single incident, for example, might look like a misdemeanor, but because of this cooperation, a pattern of, say, 30, 40, or 50 incidents across the Phoenix Valley or throughout the state might be revealed, which allows the thieves to be charged with a felony, rather than with individual misdemeanors. Prosecutors report that they are committed to charging frequent fliers with offenses whose terms can run consecutively, which is also considered when fashioning plea agreements.
Arizona laws, which serve as a model for ORC statutes, include additional penalties for aggravating factors, such as possessing Alpha keys or magnets to open locked display cases, theft for pecuniary gain, and causing harm to retailers and consumers through theft.
Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell, who describes herself as a “traditional prosecutor,” brings a grounded and no-nonsense approach to prosecutions. “ORC is tied to organizations supplying money to other criminal causes, such as terrorism, drug and human trafficking,” she says bluntly. “Retail losses mean lost jobs, lost tax revenue, and lost services in the community,” she adds.
Mitchell indicated that Maricopa County has always been open to taking ORC cases, even when other jurisdictions haven’t taken these crimes seriously in the face of rampant ORC thefts. “Everything we saw happening in California, Chicago, and New York -- why did they continue not prosecuting?” she wonders. “Prosecutors with progressive agendas came into office with the idea of not holding people accountable. I’m the traditional prosecutor. I hold people accountable.”
The County Attorney points to Target Corporation, which recently closed all its stores in Portland, Oregon. Yet Target is opening two new stores in the Valley. Taking a hard line against ORC means that retail crimes are not causing major retailers to shut down their stores or avoid opening them in the Phoenix area.
Recently, two women on a field trip from California stole in bulk from 12 stores in one day, hitting six different cities within Maricopa County. Good communication among Valley agencies avoided treating each theft as a separate one-off. Instead, the County Attorney’s Office considered the crimes in the aggregate, allowing the women to be prosecuted accordingly.
Multi-Jurisdictional Cases
When considering locales with the highest rates of ORC, Kansas is rarely at the top of mind. However, California, Texas and Florida, Kansas and Missouri are among the top ten states hit by organized retail crime.
Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, who testified at the 2023 Hearing on Organized Retail Crime and the Threat to Public Safety before the U.S House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary, indicated that the Sunflower State makes the top 10 list because of “the I-70 corridor, which has become a pipeline not only for drugs, but also for organized retail crime. There is a link between drug trafficking and organized retail crime,” he stated.
Interstate 70 runs east-west, spanning from Maryland to Utah and cutting through Kansas City, which is shared between the states of Kansas and Missouri. In addition to the two states, several surrounding municipalities make up the KC metropolitan area.
The lack of prosecutorial capacity in smaller jurisdictions meant some ORC cases were unaddressed. In 2023, Kobach made a request, which was granted, to address this issue. “I asked the state legislature for original prosecutorial authority in all cases where a course of criminal conduct occurs in two or more counties,” he said. “This allows my prosecutors to prosecute cases with state resources where a county or district attorney cannot prosecute.”
Kansas became the first state in the country to adopt this measure. Last year, Kansas enacted legislation allowing thefts to be aggregated over a 12-month period. The area takes an active stance against ORC, with the Missouri Organized Retail Crime Association (MORCA) and the Midwest Organized Retail Crime Association (MWORCA) bringing together Midwestern retailers and law enforcement to collectively combat the rising problem of retail theft and other crimes.
In addition to the beefed-up state statutes and increased area collaboration, federal prosecutors have also been interested in retail crime in the Kansas City Area. For example, a May 2025 theft ring case involved six suspects who used KC as a distribution hub for stolen items. In Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska, ORC offenses were committed. The case involved investigators from the Internal Revenue Service, the Missouri State Highway Patrol, 16 Kansas City area municipalities in Kansas and Missouri, and a dozen other agencies. According to federal court documents filed in Kansas City, Missouri, the thefts from 23 beauty and liquor stores occurred over 10 months in 2023 and 2024, with an estimated value of nearly half a million dollars. The case has resulted in a plea agreement for at least one defendant, carrying a potential sentence of up to 10 years in prison without the possibility of parole, as well as restitution to be paid to the affected businesses.
First National ORC Blitz
Now that more states are taking a proactive stance against retail crime, even those that had a laissez-faire attitude toward ORC in the past have seen the light. California, for example, whose three major cities, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Sacramento, rank in the top 10 for retail organizations impacted by this issue, has seen several chain stores close locations because retail thieves so heavily targeted them. However, the state has recently reversed course, deciding to prosecute these cases.
The Golden State has engaged in carefully coordinated blitzes to draw attention to and make arrests for ORC. The Operation Holiday Watch blitz, held to promote safe shopping experiences for communities throughout the state, took place in December of 2023 and 2024, resulting in the California Highway Patrol arresting more than 100 suspects last year. Also in December 2024, Ventura County’s Organized Retail Crime Task Force (ORCTF) conducted its "Shoplift with a Cop" blitz, resulting in the arrest of 37 individuals engaged in holiday shoplifting at the Pacific View Mall. The Ventura County Sheriff’s Office coordinated with Allied Security and LP teams from Target, JCPenney, and Macy’s to make the arrests and recover merchandise at the shopping center.
The first National Organized Retail Crime Blitz was planned for the week of May 26, 2025. Over 30 states are participating in this initiative, which is being coordinated by the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office and the Cook County Regional Organized Crime (CCROC) Task Force, with support from the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA) and the National District Attorneys Association (NDAA).
The goal of the Chicago area crackdown is critical but straightforward: disrupt and dismantle local ORC networks by simultaneously coordinating focused enforcement operations across the country. The message the blitz is meant to get across is that retail theft is not low-risk or victimless; instead, it threatens store employees and communities and is often tied to broader criminal activity like drug trafficking and fraud.
Law enforcement, retail investigators, and prosecutors nationwide are all encouraged to participate in the coast-to-coast blitz. After the event, participating groups will share results, intelligence, and lessons learned. All municipalities are encouraged to contact CCROC to participate.
With the proactive stances that ORCAs, prosecutors and law enforcement are taking, the tide can likely be turned on the climbing trends of ORC, fraud and violence in the retail sector. It has become apparent that reducing the floor amount for thefts to qualify as felonies and allowing boosters to remain in the community will not win the war against retail crime.
The triad of cooperation, collaboration, and education fosters a climate in which retailers build cases that law enforcement investigates, and prosecutors prosecute—all of which results in the prosecution of thieves for extended periods and the maintenance of safer communities. It takes not only a village but towns, states, retailers, and prosecutors to work together to combat retail crime.
Online Marketplace Crimes Targeting Small Businesses
Beyond brick-and-mortar locations, online shopping sites are subject to various criminal activities. The INFORM Consumers Act (Integrity, Notification, and Fairness in Online Retail Marketplaces for Consumers Act) is a 2023 federal law that requires online retailers to verify and disclose information about high-volume, third-party sellers to protect consumers from counterfeit, unsafe, and stolen goods by making it easier to identify and report suspicious activity.
Under the INFORM Act, online marketplaces are required to collect, verify, and disclose specific identifying information about high-volume third-party sellers, including bank account information, tax identification numbers, and contact details. ‘‘High-volume third-party sellers’’ are those sellers with 200 or more separate sales or transactions of new or unused consumer products, and $5,000 or more in gross revenues on any online sales platform.”
The Act also requires that online marketplaces conduct annual evaluations of sellers to remain in compliance. The largest retailer in the world, Amazon, claimed that its processes predated the law and that its technology reduced the number of illegitimate sellers trying to open accounts from 6 million to 800,000 in two years.
However, while Amazon may be at the forefront of consumer protection in this area, other online marketplaces are not always playing by the rules. When sellers with bad intentions were kicked off or prevented from listing their wares on Amazon’s platform, many tried their luck with competing sites. Many of them have migrated to other large, well-known web-based marketplaces, where the required vetting is not happening.
Among other crimes, the bad actors will duplicate the pages that legitimate sellers have on Amazon, listing the Amazon-offered products for sale on a different site. They place orders with the Amazon sellers for unsuspecting customers who think they are ordering from a legitimate seller on a competing website. Then, the illegitimate sellers make bogus refund requests, claiming the products were never delivered.
The fact that some online marketplaces do not comply with the INFORM Act means that small businesses selling on Amazon are being taken advantage of in large numbers.
When the INFORM Act became law in 2023, Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said, “The Commission will enforce the Act to the fullest extent possible and collaborate with our state partners to hold online marketplaces accountable.”
However, enforcement won't be possible unless the Federal Trade Commission receives complaints about the bad actors.
About the Author

Liz Martinez
Program Director of Administration of Justice and Forensic Science at Paradise Valley Community College
Liz Martinez is a consultant and expert witness in retail security, with a focus on organized retail crime, as well as in forensic linguistics. She is the Program Director of Administration of Justice and Forensic Science at Paradise Valley Community College. She is a Ph.D. candidate in linguistics at Arizona State University with a research focus on false confessions, and she serves as the Programs Chair for the Phoenix chapter of ASIS International. She is the author of the book The Retail Manager’s Guide to Crime & Loss Prevention: Protecting Your Business from Theft, Fraud and Violence (Looseleaf Law, 2004) and the novel Sticks and Stones, as well as hundreds of articles and short stories. She can be reached via www.LinkedIn.com/in/LizCMartinez.